Marketing and Communications department structure
The decision by Renault-Nissan to combine its marketing and communications departments into a single function—coming just a week after new research suggesting that CMOs are taking responsibility for traditional public relations functions (see the post below)—has raised concerns among some public relations professionals.
In this PR Week article, for example, several leading corporate communicators express several doubts about the new structure, arguing that the corporate press office should be independent of the marketing function; that PR is in danger of being subsumed by marketing because of the latter’s larger budget; and that some functions, such as investor relations, do not co-exist comfortably alongside marketing.
Given the concerns I expressed in reaction to the H&K/CMO Club survey, you might expect me to share these concerns, and to a certain extent I do. There are certainly risks in merging marketing and what Renault-Nissan calls communications but I would (see the post immediately below this one for an explanation) prefer to refer to as public relations. But I believe the opportunity presented by this sort of restructuring is too important to be dismissed out of hand.
Broadly speaking, the risk is that what I would call traditional marketing thinking will overwhelm what I would call traditional public relations thinking, and I believe this is more likely to happen—though not inevitable—if the merged function is led by someone who comes from a traditional marketing background. Unfortunately, this happens far too often, typically because the head of PR or corporate communications does not have the authority or respect within the organization to take the helm of the merger operation.
But when the merged corporate communications/marketing function is led by someone with a PR background (like Simon Sproule in the case of Nissan, or Jon Iwata at IBM) then I believe the merged function comes pretty close to the ideal I have long argued for.
You might also like
On beardsby cheaande
'A recent study in the Journal of Marketing Communications found that men with beards were deemed more credible than those who were clean-shaven.
The study showed participants pictures of men endorsing certain products. In some photos, the men were clean-shaven. In others, the same men had beards. Participants thought the men with beards had greater expertise and were significantly more trustworthy when they were endorsing products like cell phones and toothpaste.
But, oddly, men with beards were slightly less effective than smooth-cheeked fellows in underwear advertisements
Marketing in a Web 2.0 World Using Social Media, Webinars, Blogs, and More to Boost Your Small Business on a Budget
Book (Atlantic Publishing Group Inc.)
Digital Marketing Manager — Emirates 24/7
Head of the overall Digital Marketing and Communications department. 15. Develop and deliver digital marketing strategies for all clients 16.
Shaker Heights approves new $120000 contract with LiefKarson Public Relations — The Plain Dealer
The city has two full-time and two part-time employees in its marketing and communications department. Blank, the department's director, earns $90,000 a year, and administrative assistant Kim Golem earns more than $48,000 in full-time roles.
Content Strategy at Work: Real-world Stories to Strengthen Every Interactive Project
eBooks (Morgan Kaufmann)
Creative Strategy in Direct & Interactive Marketing: Third Edition
Book (Racom Communications)
Naztech12600ID Flip Cover for Samsung Galaxy S4 -Carrying Case-Retail Packaging-Orange
Voicent Broadcast By Phone Autodialer: Professional Edition